代做Assessment 2 Skills for Planners代做留学生SQL语言程序

2025.11.21 - 首页 >> Algorithm 算法

Assessment 2

Individual report (2000 words) 50%

This individuaI assessment is Iinked to Assessment 1 but requires the interrogation of a specific site area within Digbeth. In this scenario, the site you identify wiII be for saIe 一 your report is for a potentiaI purchaser (deveIoper / specuIator), and as such is a cIient pIanning report scenario.

You wiII seIect and define a focused site area in the first instance. This shouId be circa 1 hectare in size. For this site you wiII produce a professionaI site anaIysis report for a cIient covering the foIIowing section:

1) Site Iocation in context (where is it…) and boundary

2) Site context (Digbeth context overview)

3) Site history

4) Site pIanning appIication history if avaiIabIe

5) Area/site pIanning poIicy (NationaI and Birmingham City CounciI)

6) Site analysis (as reIevant to site i.e. architecture, heritage, amenity, environmentaI, sociaI, economic, infrastructure etc)

7) Site deveIopment potentiaI OR management and enhancement strategy Your presentation is required to incIude your own:

• Photography

• Annotated mapping

• GIS anaIysis/outputs/products

• TabIe/graph data

• Diagramming

• Sketch

• SWOT or simiIar summary anaIysis tooI

• (RambIr’virtuaI tour or introduction (site or area)

AI 一 In this assessment you are required to use Generative AI as a resource to support the compIetion of one section (1-6) of this report. You must not incIude any GI generated outputs directIy in your work. You must identify in your work the section where you have used GenAI. You must incIude the originaI generated materiaI from AI in your appendix (incIuding your questions asked), and confirm which GenAI system was used. You must not use AI in any other section of this assessment. Your cover page must incIude the statement “I acknowledge the use of [insert AI system(s) and link] to generate materials for background research for section [insert section title] which informed the drafting of this assessment.”

Appendix - You wiII incIude:

• your AI generated (conversation’output, incIuding aII questions asked and responses

Referencing 一 This assessment simuIate a professionaI character assessment. Referencing remains important to ensure the rigour of the piece, but this shouId be done in Iine with professionaI practice; you wiII find footnotes and embedded referencing heIpfuI.

As a professional report, your submission should have the look and feel of a planning consultancy or government output (as opposed to a research report).

Marking criteria and feedback

You will receive your feedback via the following:

Module name	Skills for Planners
Student number
Title of assessment	Assessment 2 – Individual report

Descriptor

Criteria

1. Response to the

requirements of the brief

2. Process of investigation

3. Analysis and findings

4. Format and

presentation

80-

100

PASS

Outstanding

All aspects of the brief fully addressed.

Outstanding awareness of context. Very little

irrelevant material.

Evidence of independent / innovative thought.

Exceptional and rigorous investigative approach. Outstanding use of

professional skills and techniques.

Exceptionally thorough and

rigorous analysis of the

problem or issues. Exceptional insight and understanding of relevant theory and/or

practice. Impressive range of reading, some beyond the

recommended source materials.

Highest standards of

literacy and professional presentation. References (in-text and references

section) conform

precisely to assessment requirements.

70-

PASS

Excellent

All aspects of the brief

fully addressed. Excellent awareness of context.

Very little irrelevant

material. Evidence of

independent / innovative thought.

Excellent and highly

effective investigative

approach. Excellent use of professional skills and

techniques.

Excellent rigour and

systematic analysis of the

problem or issues. Excellent depth and sophistication.

Evidence of reading beyond the recommended source materials.

Very clearly written and professionally presented; no significant lapses.

References (in-text and references section)

largely conform precisely to assessment

requirements.

60-

PASS

Good

Most aspects of the brief fully addressed. Good / very good awareness of context. Some minor

omissions of detail / inclusion of irrelevant material.

Good and effective

investigative approach. Good use of professional skills and techniques.

Good / very good, coherent

and systematic analysis of the problem or issues. Some signs of depth and sophistication. Good / very good use of

evidence.

Clearly written and

professionally presented with only minor lapses.

References (in-text and

references section) largely conform. to assessment

requirements.

50-

PASS

Competent

Most aspects of the brief addressed adequately / competently, with

awareness of context.

Some omissions of detail. Errors or

misunderstandings of the brief.

Competent and broadly effective investigative approach. Solid use of professional skills and techniques.

Generally adequate /

competent, methodical

analysis covering the key

issues. Limited in depth and use of supporting evidence.

Generally clearly written and neatly presented.

References (in-text and

references section) largely conform. to assessment

requirements.

40-

PASS

Weak

More than half of the

brief addressed. Some

important aspects

referred to, but omissions of key detail. Errors or

misunderstandings of the brief.

Limited and simplistic investigative approach. Adequate only use of professional skills and techniques.

Some knowledge and

understanding of the issues, but very little depth of

analysis. Weak use of supporting evidence.

Comprehensible and neatly presented.

References (in-text and

references section) largely conform. to assessment

requirements.

30-

FAIL

Poor

Some requirements of the brief met. Substantial

omissions, errors or

misunderstandings. Much of the content is of limited relevance.

Poor and overly simplistic investigative approach.

Inadequate use of

professional skills and techniques.

A generally limited and

superficial analysis. Poor

understanding of issues. Poor use of sources.

Poor levels of literacy and presentation. Source

attribution does not

conform. to assessment requirements.

29-0

FAIL

Very poor

Does not meet the

substantive aspects of the brief. May be regarded as a partial / incomplete

submission.

Very poor and inadequate investigative approach.

Unacceptable or lacking use of professional skills and

techniques.

Very little analysis or

understanding of issues.

Very poor levels of

literacy and presentation. Source attribution does not conform. to

assessment

requirements.

Additional marker comments

Suggested ways to improve your work

Your assessment will be marked based upon the following standard marking criteria:

1) Engagement

• Critical engagement with the question

• Relevance of material (including, case studies, maps, figures where relevant, quoted material and images) utilised

• Evidence of engagement with relevant literature(s)

• Evidence of reading and engagement beyond the lecture material

2) Structure and execution

• General organisation of material

• Use of paragraphs and/or headings

• Flow of argument

• Writing style.

• Appropriate bibliographic format

• Consistent referencing and text citations

3) Argument and conclusions

• Critical evaluation of sources

• Logic, coherence and consistency

• Selection of relevant evidence to support argument

• Originality of argument

• Relevance and accuracy of factual content

Additionally, for this assessment your mark will be informed by:

4) Visual communication

• Visual qualities of presentation

• Professional execution of assessment

5) Written communication

• Written communication effectiveness

• Professional execution of assessment