代做URDE2001/URDE5009 Participatory Planning Assessment 3代做Python编程

URDE2001/URDE5009 Participatory Planning

Assessment 3 (40%) - Individual

Design exercise

Brief

Assessment 3 is an applied design exercise, in which you will design a participation program for a real planning / development project (Learning Objective 3: Outline a participation program for a planning case study). This assessment will allow you to demonstrate your skills across the full set of  learning outcomes for the unit, by applying the theory and practical techniques you have learnt to a real-life case study and designing an ‘ideal’ participation program for that case study (Learning Objective: Apply participation theories to practical case studies and Learning Objective 2: Explain different participatory practices)

Identify a case study project by searching the websites of state and local government authorities, or monitoring local media.  You should aim to choose a case that has enough complexity to be interesting, but not so much that it is overwhelming.  A development application for a single dwelling, for instance, would not give you the richness you need, whereas a major project like Elizabeth Quay would be too much!  Some questions to ask yourself:

•    Does this case raise issues of concern to a wider group of people than just the developer?

•    Is there enough publicly available information forme to understand the issues?

•    Are the issues of interest tome?

•    Will there be some public discussion of this case during the coming weeks?

There will be time during the workshops to discuss your options and ideas with the teaching team.

Highly recommended: Attend acommunity advisory committee, planning committee and/or council meeting at which the project is discussed.  Alternatively, there maybe a public meeting about the project arranged by residents’ groups or other non-government organizations – these would be good to attend too.  You should aim to do this as soon as possible! Take notes during the event.  You need to recall what issues were raised, and what sorts of arguments people were making in support  of one position or another.

Part A (word limit 2000 words maximum)

Produce a participatory program to address a planning issue of your choice. The issue may be relevant to your local area or city. It does not have to be a ‘live’ planning issue - you can focus on any issue that you think participatory planning may be an appropriate response. For example,a strategy to revitalisea retail strip; a plan to address the environmental degradation of a local wetland; the under-provision of sporting fields in a rural town. The program may involve a single participatory  event or a series of linked events with a common purpose.

You may structure the program as you wish, but make sure you address the following:

•    Establish a clear purpose for the program

•    A thorough context analysis of the issue

•    Identification of relevant stakeholders

•    Recommended sequence of events - make sure you order them logically and say what you hope each event will achieve

•    Your program must give enough concrete detail to allow someone to acton your recommendations.

Part B (word limit 500 words maximum)

Provide a written justification for the choices you have made regarding your participatory program. You are required to draw on some of the theories of participation discussed in the unit to support    your arguments.

Output

•    Submit your proposed program, using the template provided on Blackboard as a guide.

•    You should draw upon the unit materials – lectures, workshop activities, guest lectures,

readings – to inform. your (see the Reading List for some key texts). Other resources – policy research, web-pages, blogs, web-media – are encouraged provided they are used appropriately and referenced correctly.

•    Figures, images and tables can be used sparingly and only if they illustrate key points

presented in the program. Figures, images and tables should be presented in professional format (labelled, referenced and easy to read).

•    Use 11pt plain theme font (Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman);

•    Use Chicago Style. for referencing. See the Library website:

http://libguides.library.curtin.edu.au/referencing

Referencing & Gen-AI

The assessment is required to be correctly referenced in Chicago 17th  edition referencing style. and in accordance with Curtin University policy. All source material MUST be acknowledged, and any form. of plagiarism will result in the appropriate measures being taken. Do not copy other 'students'work   or assist by showing your work to others.

You can find information on how to reference correctly here: Curtin University Library referencing  The use of Gen-AI software for this assessment is not permitted, with the exception of theCurtin version of Grammarly.

Turnitin: Curtin uses Turnitin’s Gen-AI writing indicator to check assessments for undisclosed use of Gen-AI software. Turnitin’stool is the only verify ed and endorsed Gen-AI detection software

accepted at Curtin. The Turnitin report shows the text within the submitted student document that has been written with Gen-AI tools.

Some examples of tools, where the output will be flagged by Turnitin are:

•    Text generators like Chat GPT and BARD

•    Language translation tools like DeepL

•    Paraphrasing tools like Quillbot and Grammarly (free version, premium, and Go)

Note: TheCurtin version of Grammarlyis the only approved version of this software for use and it will not be picked up within the Turnitin report as written by Gen-AI.

Understand that only staff have access to view this information within the Turnitin Similarity Report. Turnitin controls this access, and it is not something that Curtin can alter.

Unapproved, inappropriate, or undisclosed use maybe dishonest or unfair behaviour, and therefore  considered misconduct. This means that you must be transparent and honest about your use of Gen- AI software within your assessments to avoid misconduct.

More information: Visit theAcademic Integrity Websiteor theLibrary Website on Gen-AIfor more information.

Resources

1.        Learn how to analyse your assessment briefs here:

https://uniskills.library.curtin.edu.au/assignment/analyse-brief/analyse/

2.        You can find support on critical thinking and study habits here:

https://uniskills.library.curtin.edu.au/study/

Assessment 3 Marking Criteria

Element	Criteria	Marks   Possible
Proposed program (Part A)	Influence of context	20
	Identify strategies	20
	Student’s position	10
Justification (Part B)	Solving problems	20
	Sources and evidence	10
Presentation	Written expression	10
	Referencing	10
Total		100