代做FTA005 Film Appreciation代做留学生Matlab编程
- 首页 >> Algorithm 算法FTA005 Film Appreciation
Final Assessment
Grade ：100% offnal mark
Objective: The purpose of this assignment is to engage you in a deep analysis of a film of your choice, demonstrating your understanding of the film and your ability to articulate your appreciation through a video essay. This assessment encourages you to explore not only the narrative and thematic aspects of the film but also the cinematic components that contribute to its artistic and emotional impact.
Requirement:
1. Film Selection:
Choose a film that you find particularly engaging or significant. The film should provide rich material for analysis.
2. Analysis Components:
a. Narrative and Themes: Present your understanding of the narrative and theme of the film briefly.
b. Cinematic Techniques: Examine the use of cinematic techniques such as
cinematography, editing, sound design, and mise-en-scène (every aspect will be introduced in class) . Discuss how these cinematic elements enhance the film’s narrative, mood, and emotional impact.
3. Duration: 5-7mins.
4. Content:
a. Your video essay should feature a combination of film clips, still images, voice-over commentary, and any additional audiovisual materials that support your analysis.
b. The oral presentation should be in English.
c. The video should be subtitled in English.
5. Submission Requirements:
a. File Name: your Name_StudentNumber (i.e: Biwei Cong_2322055)
b. File Format: 1920*1080
c. Upload your video to Bilibili or YouTube (make sure it’s available until March 2025)
d. Submit your video link and the full text of your oral presentation in the video essay in one pdf file via LMO (See Sample in the next page).
6. Submission Deadline:
23:59, 17th Nov. 2024 (Week 9)
Late submission penalty: 5 points deduction per day. Works will not be accepted if they are more than 5 working days past the deadline.
7. Examples of video essay:
What’s So Great About Lady Bird； Satoshi Kon
|
Grading Rubrics |
|||||
|
Criteria |
70+ |
60-69 |
50-59 |
40-49 |
<40 |
|
Depth of Analysis (40%) |
Demonstrates a deep understanding of narratve, themes, and cinematc elements. |
Demonstrates a good understandi ng of the flm. May lack the depth or originality but stll provides strong insights. |
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the flm. Ideas are generally clear but may be underdevelope d. |
Demonstrates limited understanding of the flm’s deeper meanings or cinematc aspects. Ideas are underdevelop ed or poorly artculated. |
Displays a lack of understandi ng of the flm’s content, themes, and cinematc aspects. |
|
Clarity of Argume nt (40%) |
The analysis is very well- structured, with each point clearly connected to the overall thesis. Supportng evidence is well-chosen and efectvely integrated. |
A good structure. Points are generally well- supported and connected to the thesis, though some areas may lack depth or clarity. |
Argument is present but may lack coherence or depth. Points may be loosely connected, with some gaps in logic or insufcient supportng evidence. |
Lacks logical structure, with points that are disjointed or poorly supported by evidence. |
The work lacks a cohesive thesis or logical structure. |
|
Quality of the Video (20%) |
High-quality video producton. Cle ar audio, sharp visuals, and smooth editng. Creatve use of flm clips and images to support the analysis. The video is engaging. |
Good video producton wi th clear audio and visuals. Editng is smooth, though may lack creatvity or polish in some areas. The video efectvely supports the analysis. |
Adequate video producton, bu t with notceable issues (e.g., audio clarity, visual quality, editng). The video supports the analysis but may not fully engage the viewer. |
Poor video producton, wi th signifcant technical issues that detract from the analysis. The video is disjointed, unclear, or difcult to follow. |
Very poor or no video producton. Technical issues severely undermine the analysis or the video is unwatchable . |