CTEC5805留学生辅导、讲解JAVA/C++程序语言、辅导JAVA/C++设计

Faculty of Technology – Course work Specification 2018/19

Module name: Cyber Engineering

Module code: CTEC5805

Title of the Assignment: Coursework

This coursework item is: (delete as appropriate) Summative

This summative coursework will be marked anonymously Yes

The learning outcomes that are assessed by this coursework are:

1. Critically analyse various communication technologies for large building

environment

2. Designing and understanding of various communication engineering components

3. Capabilities to design a desired FM transmitter with the available resources

This coursework is: (delete as appropriate) Individual

If other or a mixed ... explain here:

This coursework constitutes 100% to the overall module mark.

Date Set: 12/10/18

Date & Time Due: 12/01/19 unless otherwise agreed

Your marked coursework and feedback will be

available to you on:

If for any reason this is not forthcoming by the due date your module

leader will let you know why and when it can be expected. The Head of

Studies should be informed of any issues relating to the return of

marked coursework and feedback.

Note that you should normally receive feedback on your coursework by

no later than 20 University working days after the formal hand-in

date, provided that you have met the submission deadline.

12/Feb/2019

When completed you are required to submit your coursework to:

1. Electronic copy to blackboard via Turnitin

If you need any support or advice on completing this coursework please visit the Student

Matters tab on the Faculty of Technology Blackboard page.

Late submission of coursework policy: Late submissions will be processed in accordance

with current University regulations which state:

“the time period during which a student may submit a piece of work late without authorisation and

have the work capped at 40% [50% at PG level] if passed is 14 calendar days. Work submitted

unauthorised more than 14 calendar days after the original submission date will receive a mark of 0%.

These regulations apply to a student’s first attempt at coursework. Work submitted late without

authorisation which constitutes reassessment of a previously failed piece of coursework will always

receive a mark of 0%.”

Word Limits

Maximum word limit: 3000 words. Where word limits are specified, answers can exceed

the word limit by up to 10% without penalty; then a penalty of 20% of the marks for

answers that exceed the word limit by up to 30%. The part of any answer that

exceeds the word limit by over 30% would not be marked and hence not contribute to

the final mark.

Academic Offences and Bad Academic Practices:

These include plagiarism, cheating, collusion, copying work and reuse of your own work, poor

referencing or the passing off of somebody else's ideas as your own. If you are in any doubt about

what constitutes an academic offence or bad academic practice you must check with your tutor.

Further information and details of how DSU can support you, if needed, is available at:

http://www.dmu.ac.uk/dmu-students/the-student-gateway/academic-support-office/academicoffences.aspx

and

http://www.dmu.ac.uk/dmu-students/the-student-gateway/academic-support-office/bad-academicpractice.aspx

Tasks to be undertaken:

1. Design and describe a single tuning circuit that can receive frequencies of 96MHz,

100MHz and 104MHz. What are the mechanisms to avoid the side channel noise and

improve the frequency selection? (25 MARKS)

2. Design and describe an indirect FM modulator to generate an FM carrier with the

carrier frequency of 96MHz and frequency deviation of 20KHz. A narrow band FM

generator with carrier frequency of 200KHz and adjustable frequency deviation in

the range of 9 to 10 Hz is available. The stock room also has an oscillator with

adjustable frequency in the range of 9 to 10MHz. There is a band pass filter with any

center frequency, and only frequency doublers are available. (25 MARKS)

3. Develop and describe a network communication model for any large building

application of your choice (educational institute or industry etc.) utilising at least two

different technologies among Bluetooth, GSM, RFID and CAN. (10 MARKS)

Develop a protocol for each of the following scenario along with its message scheduling

policy.

1. Identification of a person when enters into the building. (20 MARKS)

2. Handling an emergency scenario. (20 MARKS)

Note: The breakdown of 20 marks for each scenario in task 3 is:

10 Marks for protocol development and explanation,

5 marks for message scheduling diagram and

5 marks for message scheduling diagram explanation.

How the work will be marked:

See attached matrix

Module leader/tutor name: Dr Sarmadullah Khan

Contact details: sarmadullah.khan@dmu.ac.uk

% Fail 0..39 Fail 40..50 50..59 60..69 70..100

25

Completeness (detail description of tasks implementation with possible evidences e.g. simulation outputs, timing diagrams analysis

etc.)

Little to

no effort

shown

Work is missing large sections

Work has been completed to an

acceptable level but could have

been greatly expanded.

Some things have been missed

off that could have been

included or have not been

reported in real depth

Work has been completed to

a high standard, with some

work looked at in depth but

other section could have

been further built upon.

Work is fully complete. All

sections have been thought

out and described in detail.

35

Understanding (Implementations should meet the technical concepts)

Little to

no effort

shown

The report does not convey to the

reader that the student has

understood the concepts being

assessed.

The report shows some

understanding of the underlying

topics but the explanations are

somewhat lacking.

The report shows clear

understanding of the topic by

the student. Topics are

covered in depth and well

explained.

Excellent understanding of

the underlying topic is

displayed by the student.

Topic is comprehensively

covered and reasoned.

25

Critical analysis (e.g. why a specific component/technology is selected complete a task? What are its advantages over other

components or technologies? )

Little to

no effort

shown

Student has provided little to no

explanation for decisions made and

their implications.

Student has thought about the

discoveries/methodology used

and provides some explanation

behind decisions and their

implications within the scope of

the project.

Student demonstrates clear

critical analysis behind

decisions weighing up both

pro and cons before making

decisions. These decisions

are then reported and their

possible implications are than

Excellent critical analysis is

demonstrated. Decisions

have been well researched

and thought out. All

possible outcomes and their

security implications are

assessed and presented in

assessed. a clear and concise manner.

15

Style (Does reader easily understand the report)

Little to

no effort

shown

Report is poorly written and requires

significant goodwill on the part of

the reader.

References are poor, inconsistent or

out of date.

Report is written to an

acceptable standard with

sections clearly defined.

Requires some goodwill on the

part of the reader.

References are present but are

often inconsistent or out of date

Report is well written with

clear explanation of all

sections and requires little

goodwill on the part of the

reader.

References are consistent, up

to date and of good quality.

The report is excellently

written and enjoyable to

read.

References are complete and

of a high standard.