代做BEAM065 Bank Management Coursework 2代写C/C++程序

BEAM065 Bank Management

Coursework 2 (60% of the mark for this module) Submission Deadline: 1st May. Word limit: 3,000.

This assignment consists of two options. Both options are worth 100 marks. YOU NEED TO CHOOSE EITHER OPTION 1 OR OPTION 2.

Option 1

Using data from Compustat for a large sample of banks (at least 50) and over a period of at least 5 years, examine the determinants of bank dividend payouts:

- Fama and French (2001) hypothesis

- Risk-shifting theory

- Signalling theory

- Life-cycle theory

As proxies for dividend payouts, you can use any (or all) of the following variables:

-   Dividend-to-asset ratio

-   Dividend-to-equity ratio

-   Dividend payout ratio

Or you can use dividend payout dummy variables as follows:

-   Dividend pay dummy

-   Dividend increase dummy

-   Dividend decrease dummy

-   Dividend omission dummy

In your analysis, you can consider different dimensions/variables, e.g., bank capital, bank size, deposits, and any other, following the relevant literature.

Moreover, you can use a variety of specifications (as many as you want, e.g., large banks and small banks or different periods). You should also discuss your results by comparing them with those in the relevant literature. Finally, you should discuss the potential pitfalls of the methodology used (if any).

(100 marks)

(no more than 3,000 words)

IMPORTANT: For your analysis you MUST use STATA. The reference list,

tables (including notes and titles of the tables) and figures (including notes and titles of the tables) do NOT count towards the word limit. You do NOT need an introduction or conclusion in your report, but you can divide your report into three different sections, one to describe briefly your methodology, one for your  dataset (e.g, database used and sampleselection), and one for the discussion of the results.

Suggested structure for the report:

1.1 Methodology 1.2 Data

1.3 Discussion of the results

Option 2

Download the annual reports of two banks, “Bank X” and “Bank Y”, for the last 5 years. These two banks must be headquartered in the same country and must be competitors in at least one line of business (e.g., they engage in “retail banking” activities). Then, compare the two banks in terms of:

a)  Overall performance and its main drivers

b) Risk profile

c)  Corporate governance structure

d) Dividend payout policy (if any)

e)  International activities (if any)

f)  Funding strategies

g) Hedging strategies (if any)

(100 marks)

(no more than 3,000 words)

IMPORTANT: The reference list does NOT count towards the word limit. You do NOT need an introduction or conclusion in your essay.

Further guidelines

This assignment requires you to focus on the concepts and theories developed in weeks 1 to 10, and is related to the ILOs 1-2, 4-10.  You are expected to read all of the relevant core academic material on ELE. Evidence of reading optional articles will be rewarded if it improves the quality of your answers. The marking criteria are stated in Appendix A below.

IMPORTANT: Academic misconduct

The material you submit must be your own work and written in your own words. Where you have used quoted material, you must make full reference to it.

You might be asked to send the data used in your analysis to the Module Leader (Dr.  Thaer Alhalabi), along with any other file that you might have used for your data analysis (e.g.,

Excel file, STATA do-file or log file). Dr. Thaer Alhalabi might also ask you to explain how you ran the regressions, either via email or during an online meeting on Teams. Further investigation of potential academic misconduct might ensue, according to University regulations.

More information on referencing style

https://vle.exeter.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=6748&section=2

Late Submission of Assignments

You must submit your assignment by the deadline specified. If you fail to submit on time, the following penalties apply:

•     Work submitted up to 1 hour after the deadline, which has reached the standard of the

module passmark or above, will be subject to a penalty of 5% of the total available mark for the coursework, down to a minimum score of the module passmark.

•     The penalty for assessed work submitted up to two weeks and without an agreed extension is a capped mark of 50%.

•     Assessed work submitted more than two weeks beyond a submission date will receive a mark of zero.

Mitigation

• https://www.exeter.ac.uk/students/infopoints/yourinfopointservices/mitigation/

BART Submission

Online Submission Student Summary Sheet v19

Online Submission Student Handbook v19

Academic Honesty Advice for Students prior to Submission v2

Appendix A: Marking Rubric

Mark	(Fail/Condon able Fail)	Pass	Merit	Distinction	Weighting
Marking Criteria	<50	50-59	60-69	>70	% of total mark
Knowledge and Understanding of the Subject	Gaps in knowledge and only superficial understanding of the well- established principles of area(s) of study.	Broad knowledge and understanding of material, of well- established principles of area(s) of study, and of the way in which those principles have been developed.	Very good knowledge and understanding of material, of well- established principles of area(s) of study, and of the way in which those principles have been developed.	Very good, detailed knowledge and understanding of material, main concepts/theories at this level. Awareness of the limitation of their knowledge, and how this influences any analyses and interpretations based on that knowledge.	40%
Analysis and Interpretation Demonstration of logical analysis and critical interpretation.	Little or no analysis of findings, concepts or theoretical  ideas; descriptive, simplistic and anecdotal and/or incorrect.	Satisfactory application and analysis of findings/concepts, perhaps with some deviation  from theoretical premises.	Good application and analysis of findings/concepts carried out in line with methodological and theoretical premises.	Application and analysis of findings/concepts carried out accurately and with high degree of competence in line with methodological and theoretical premises.	45%
Style and Structure 1) Clear structure, and attention to grammar and spelling. 2) Use of recommended and other reading materials. 3) Correct academic referencing.	Poor structure and grammar which is hard to follow or understand; incorrectly formatted, with no references or poorly chosen ones.	Overall structure and organisation is satisfactory. Internal coherence of the whole is satisfactory. Make consistently sound use of appropriate academic conventions and academic honesty.	Good structure and grammar, which is easy to follow and understand. Make consistently good use of appropriate academic conventions and academic honesty.	Clearly structured and lucidly expressed.  Make consistently excellent use of appropriate academic conventions and   academic honesty Evidence of further research. Excellent range and quality of references to support analysis.	15%
					Total 100%