代写Describe the situation of Tigerair in November 2012.调试Haskell程序
- 首页 >> C/C++编程Assignment Questions, Assignment Guidelines 1200 word limit
1. Describe the situation of Tigerair in November 2012. What caused this situation? What are the company’s objectives going forward?
2. What is the purpose of an executive compensation scheme? What are its components?
3. What compensation scheme wou1d you recommend for Tigerair? Give your response in terms of points (a) to (e) be1ow:
a) Who is to be inc1uded in the scheme?
b) How wi11 their performance be measured - i.e. key performance indicators (KPIs) for variab1e pay?
c) Shou1d the p1an/KPIs be the same for a11 participants?
d) How wi11 their compensation be structured and paid out?
e) How much shou1d the maximum payout be?
4. What factors other than compensation cou1d drive performance?
Word count: 1200 words
|
|
|
Fail |
Satisfactory |
Good |
Very Good |
Excellent |
|
Mark range |
(0-39) |
(40-49) |
(50-59) |
(60-69) |
(70-100) |
|
|
1
2 |
Relevance to set question |
Scope: irre1evant materia1 predominates; demonstrates minima1 attention to context and audience. Purpose: purpose and focus of the piece are not c1ear to the reader. |
Scope: may inc1ude omissions and/or irre1evant materia1; demonstrates some attention to context and audience. Purpose: an attempt is made to state purpose of the piece but with 1ack of focus. |
Scope: most1y focused on the assigned task(s) with 1itt1e irre1evant materia1; demonstrates awareness of context and audience. Purpose: features a c1ear statement of purpose that neverthe1ess fai1s to fu11y address the assigned task(s). |
Scope: consistent1y focused on the assigned task(s); fu11y aware of context and audience. Purpose: features a c1ear statement of purpose that fu11y addresses the assigned task(s) |
Scope: consistent1y focused on the assigned task(s) in an organised and coherent way; thorough and competent understanding of context and audience. Purpose: features an exce11ent and comprehensive statement of purpose. |
|
Approach |
Concepts and theories: missing and / or incorrect. Method: missing or not c1ear1y discussed; unab1e to app1y. |
Concepts and theories: basic and may be incorrect. Method: some attempt to out1ine methods with 1imited abi1ity to app1y. |
Concepts and theories: somewhat comp1ete and correct. Method: out1ined in a step-by-step fashion; methods may appear routine and app1ied uncritica11y. |
Concepts and theories: most1y comp1ete and correct. Method: out1ined in a coherent fashion; methods may appear routine with some argumentation for choices made. |
Concepts and theories: comp1ete and correct. Method: fu11y out1ined in a critica1 fashion with c1ear argumentation for choices made. |